[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FTE-based pricing
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: FTE-based pricing
- From: Elsa Anderson <ekand@conncoll.edu>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:55:37 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I am the acquisitions librarian at a very small (350 FTE) liberal arts college. There are several databases that we can only subscribe to because they are willing to consider FTE pricing. We have an extremely limited budget and have been very challenged by rising journal and database costs.
Expecting us to pay the same price as a 10,000 FTE campus, or even a 1,000 FTE campus is unfair and has kept us from subscribing to databases in the past.
Elsa Anderson
Stefanie Wittenbach wrote:
I personally believe that FTE-based pricing is quite harmful to the library community for the following reasons: Use is not necessarily tied to the institution's FTE. Growing campuses are penalized because the price continues to increase, but the users of the resource may not be growing in the same way. If anything, I think database pricing should be a flat rate or flat rate plus some factor for high use. Stefanie Stefanie Wittenbach Assistant Dean, Collections John Peace Library The University of Texas at San Antonio San Antonio, TX 78249-0671 stefanie.wittenbach@utsa.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: FTE-based pricing
- Next by Date: RE: FTE-based pricing
- Previous by thread: RE: FTE-based pricing
- Next by thread: RE: FTE-based pricing
- Index(es):