[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: FTE-based pricing
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: FTE-based pricing
- From: "Tracy L. Thompson" <tracy.thompson@yale.edu>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:41:00 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I would really like to find a forum for a back-to-basics discussion about pricing models for e-resources and the justifications for or arguments against them. I entered the discussion in the mid-90s after the basic terms had already been established. I don't know what the original arguments were. How did we even get to usage-based pricing? What industry built that model and how did we buy into it for information? Does it still hold up? What about the inherent value of the content independent of usage? And what about pricing models based upon "maintaining print spend?" How does that make sense for the consumer? And what should we be advocating as the 'best' model for all involved, not just library/consumers and not just vendor/publishers.
I feel like it's time to revisit all of these models and at least reassure ourselves that they still hold water. If anyone else would be interested in a dialogue, or has some background or insight they'd like to share, please respond to me directly and I'll see if there is enough interest to plan a webinar or something.
Cheers,
Tracy
At 02:46 PM 10/12/2006, Stefanie Wittenbach wrote:
I personally believe that FTE-based pricing is quite harmful to the library community for the following reasons: Use is not necessarily tied to the institution's FTE. Growing campuses are penalized because the price continues to increase, but the users of the resource may not be growing in the same way. If anything, I think database pricing should be a flat rate or flat rate plus some factor for high use. Stefanie Stefanie Wittenbach Assistant Dean, Collections John Peace Library The University of Texas at San Antonio San Antonio, TX 78249-0671 stefanie.wittenbach@utsa.edu
****
[mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Porzio, Steve
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 6:31 PM
To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Subject: FTE-based pricing
The American Statistical Association (ASA) is considering a change from its current flat-rate charge for web access to its journals to a tiered, FTE-based pricing structure. I am seeking librarians familiar with various journal pricing structures who would be willing to answer a few questions and give me their general thoughts on this potential change. We strongly wish to avoid harming relations with our library patrons and would much prefer to collaborate with those who purchase our journals. If you are willing to provide input, please contact me at steve@amstat.org.
The ASA is, among many other things, a non-profit publisher of statistical journals. More info may be found at www.amstat.org/publications.
***************************
Stephen Porzio
Associate Executive Director and
Director of Operations
American Statistical Association
Alexandria, Virginia 22314-1943
www.amstat.org
********************************* Tracy L. Thompson, Executive Director New England Law Library Consortium (NELLCO) www.nellco.org 603-357-3385 (voice) 603-357-2075 (fax) tracy.thompson@yale.edu
- Prev by Date: Report Suggests U.K. Consider Regulating Licensed Content
- Next by Date: Re: UK scholarly journals: An evidence-based analysis (by RIN/EPS)
- Previous by thread: RE: FTE-based pricing
- Next by thread: Re: FTE-based pricing
- Index(es):