[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Follow up of EC-commissioned "Study on the economic and technical evolution of the scientific publication markets in Europe" (fwd)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Follow up of EC-commissioned "Study on the economic and technical evolution of the scientific publication markets in Europe" (fwd)
- From: "Hunsucker, R.L." <R.L.Hunsucker@uva.nl>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:28:22 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Stevan Harnad wrote : > Research is not done, or funded, in order to support the > publishing industry. That's indeed not often (but may occasionally be) a primary incentive. It is, however, often a secondary or implicit motivation. Thus, I'd say that the dynamics are less cut-and-dried than here represented. > ... that researchers (and their institutions and funders) > are both the *providers* of research and the *users* of > research (in generating further research, ... It remains questionable, for one thing, just how typical is the situation in which the ultimately published version of research in the natural sciences is what the productive researchers are in practice using in generating further research or sometimes perhaps even "applications". - L. Hunsucker Bibliotheek, U. v. Amsterdam
- Prev by Date: Electronic Resources & Libraries 2007: thinkdigital
- Next by Date: Re: Quality and mandated open access
- Previous by thread: Electronic Resources & Libraries 2007: thinkdigital
- Next by thread: Good article in Library Connection on managing vendor relations
- Index(es):