[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Confidentiality clause is back in at Nature
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Confidentiality clause is back in at Nature
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 12:19:41 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> As to confidentiality of pricing, this is due to negotiations > with consortia. The license I'm negotiating with them is not for a consortial purchase, but for our institution alone. I might be able to countenance the confidentiality clause if it were for a consortial deal. (Though I'm not sure why I feel that way. Hmmm. Need to think about it more...) ---- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Confidentiality clause is back in at Nature
- Next by Date: Research Communication Costs in Australia. Dept of Education, Science and Training Report
- Previous by thread: Re: Confidentiality clause is back in at Nature
- Next by thread: RE: Confidentiality clause is back in at Nature
- Index(es):