[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IP qy: JCR
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: IP qy: JCR
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:04:49 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I ask for an anonymous friend: Many journals list their latest JCR Impact Factor on their sites. This is obviously a fair use, even for commercial purposes, as it is one data point out of 6,000/year. (Or do they perhaps do it with specific permission from Thomson?) My friend runs a university departmental blog in her biomedical subject, and she wants to manually collect from the journals' home pages the IFs for the top 10 journals in perhaps a dozen fields, and place them on her blog. She plans to format them differently, not using the JCR abbreviations, give lesser precison as she finds it on the sites, and not do multi-year trends or further analysis, which is a major part of the value in JCR. It would seem to meet the usual tests: it's for educational use, it's only 2% of the material, it is not really an adequate substitute for JCR: people without access to JCR might use her numbers, but it is hard to imagine an institution that would otherwise buy JCR using these numbers instead. Is it legitimate fair use? And, btw, would it be fair use to compute the 8 year impact factor, from ISI data but which ISI does not include in JCR, and post that, for some or all journals? David Goodman, Ph.D., M.L.S. previously: Bibliographer and Research Librarian
- Prev by Date: Pediatrics on-line access through ProQuest
- Next by Date: Questions on Archive License Language
- Previous by thread: Pediatrics on-line access through ProQuest
- Next by thread: Questions on Archive License Language
- Index(es):