[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Raym Crow on publishing coopersatives
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Raym Crow on publishing coopersatives
- From: <Toby.GREEN@oecd.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:26:35 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Raym Crow might like to think about ALPSP (the Association of Learned, Professional and Society Publishers) which is already doing some of this co-operative work. One key example is the ALPSP Collection which brings together more than 450 journals into a single service, thus overcoming some of the structural contraints he mentions. Since launching the Collection, ALPSP has seen a good number of learned societies join for the first time - so the concept of working together in this way is clearly attractive. ALPSP has recently establised chapters in the US and Australasia in response to growing interest in its cooperative work. Toby Green -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Joseph J. Esposito Sent: 13 September, 2006 3:53 AM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Raym Crow on publishing coopersatives Interesting -- and unexpected, considering the SPARC connection -- piece by Raym Crow in the current issue of FirstMonday (http://firstmonday.org) on setting up publishing cooperatives designed to make not-for-profit publishers more competitive. I know about a foolish consistency is a hobgoblin, etc., but I am puzzled by what could appear to be a policy shift at SPARC away from Open Access toward NFP publishing. Or does Crow not speak for SPARC? Beats me. Anyway, here is the abstract: "Publishing cooperatives - owned, controlled, and benefiting non-profit publishers - would provide an organizational and financial structure well suited to balancing society publishers' twin imperatives of financial sustainability and mission fulfillment. Market challenges and structural constraints often render it difficult for small society publishers to compete individually. Publishing cooperatives would allow society publishers to remain independent while operating collectively to overcome both structural and strategic disadvantages and to address the inefficiencies in the market for academic journals. Publishing cooperatives can provide a scaleable publishing model that aligns with the values of the academy while providing a practical financial framework capable of sustaining society publishing programs." Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Raym Crow on publishing coopersatives
- Next by Date: Revised University of California Libraries Principles for Acquiring and Licensing Information in Digital Formats
- Previous by thread: Raym Crow on publishing coopersatives
- Next by thread: RE: Raym Crow on publishing coopersatives
- Index(es):