[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Heads up: Nature license and confidentiality
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Heads up: Nature license and confidentiality
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:23:55 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Transparency is great, right? The catch is, once you post the > information, you can't negotiate any terms ever again. I think you're exaggerating my position here, Joe. I'm not arguing that all libraries ought to go out and publicly display all of their licenses. But I _am_ arguing that the public has a right to know (if it wishes to find out) the terms under which it's spending its money. And that libraries benefit more from being able to share information about their negotiations (when they choose to) than from getting secret deals that may or may not put them at an advantage over their colleagues. ---- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: First full year results from Oxford Open released
- Next by Date: RE: Heads up: Nature license and confidentiality
- Previous by thread: Re: Heads up: Nature license and confidentiality
- Next by thread: RE: Heads up: Nature license and confidentiality
- Index(es):