[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
I have this article I need to find
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: I have this article I need to find
- From: "Hamaker, Charles" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:31:56 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
So listen, I have this article I need to find. I know the author's name and the title of the article. How do I find it. What's the library response today? The quickest response is go to google scholar and type in the author's name in quotes (or the title in quotes). And click on the link you get. The teaching response is probably much longer, and to be honest, with the depth of indexing in google scholar with only a few major publishers holding out, a teaching response is probably going to not do much more than slow the user down, or lose them and send them to google rather than try to do it the "right" way. Because the teaching response is first you pick a database. Which database, well, that depends on what you know about the article, the journal it's in, the date of the article. If a librarian tries to send me to the library catalog, why should I go there, I don't want the JOURNAL, I want the article. If you send me to a database, someone has to determine first if the journal with the date I want is IN a specific database. And I don't really NEED to do that to get to many publisher website articles anymore. And what do I think if I go to google scholar and find the article and click on the link and get the article? Well the most obvious conclusion is why did I need a library in the first place if it's free on the web? Librarians MIGHT know its not free on the web, that I am only getting the article because someone paid the bill, but then again, other staff in the library might NOT know its because someone paid the bill. And the end user isn't asking WHY they got it; they just know they got it. So, for a modest proposal. Along with the obligatory copyright statement, could publishers please add, so its prints when the article prints, an obligatory THIS ARTICLE BROUGHT TO YOU BUY UNIVERSITY XYZ? With otherwise well educated and net savy users, I'm having a problem, even with those who know something of what I spend my days doing--getting them to believe that if they found it on google scholar that the Library and University had anything to do with them actually getting the article. This is dangerous for all sorts of reasons, and the biggest danger is de-funding of library purchasing. If an educated net savy user can't tell that the article was paid for by someone, we can hear a lot of "I found it free on the net" when it is anything but free. The alternative, an XML file from each university library with an open URL resolver set up with Google so the library can be selected in "Scholar Preferences" is the only other option for suggesting to library users that a specific library had something to do with getting their article. But that option is too much for many libraries to provide: either they don't have a resolver or may not have the know-how to create the XML file in the format Google needs. That still doesn't tell the casual user the article is paid for by a library. So how about it? Can we get a brought to you by statement printed right next to that copyright statement? Chuck Hamaker Associate University Librarian Collections and Technical Services Atkins Library University of North Carolina Charlotte Charlotte, NC 28223
- Prev by Date: Re: ARL Institutional Repositories SPEC Kit
- Next by Date: Ithaka study on Open Source Software in Higher Education
- Previous by thread: Heads up: Nature license and confidentiality
- Next by thread: RE: I have this article I need to find
- Index(es):