[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Search-Engine article published
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Search-Engine article published
- From: Ann Okerson <ann.okerson@yale.edu>
- Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:15:38 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Of possible interest.
Bakkalbasi, Nisa, Kathleen Bauer, and Janis Glover, et al. <http://www.bio-diglib.com/content/3/1/7>
Three Options for Citation Tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science"
<http://www.bio-diglib.com/home/>Biomedical Digital Libraries
3(7)(2006)
(<http://www.bio-diglib.com/content/3/1/7>http://www.bio-diglib.com/content/3/1/7).
- You want a citation database that gives you the highest number of citations possible for articles. Should you use Google Scholar, Scopus, or Web of Science? This article is "an observational study examining these three databases; comparing citation counts for articles from two disciplines (oncology and condensed matter physics) and two years (1993 and 2003)." Its findings: which database is best depends upon the discipline and the year of publication. -
- Prev by Date: Wiley News Release: Wiley Announces Significant Increases in its Journal Impact Factors
- Next by Date: Version 63, Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography
- Previous by thread: Wiley News Release: Wiley Announces Significant Increases in its Journal Impact Factors
- Next by thread: Version 63, Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography
- Index(es):