[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Subscription to Open Access Transition
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Subscription to Open Access Transition
- From: "Sally Morris \(ALPSP\)" <sally.morris@alpsp.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:12:06 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
What is being ignored is the equally valid evidence about downloads Sally Morris, Chief Executive Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers Email: sally.morris@alpsp.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Prosser" <david.prosser@bodley.ox.ac.uk> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 12:30 AM Subject: RE: Subscription to Open Access Transition
Sally, The reason that physics is 'trotted' out is because it is a piece of evidence and evidence trumps theoretical concerns. Is there one piece of evidence that has been made public that can attribute any of the 3-5% annual decline in subscriptions over the past 20 years to self-archiving? I don't think there is.
Naturally we can all construct scenarios in which the market will change and publishers have every right to do so. (I would say that small publishers should be doing more of it.) But to date the only evidence we have of the effect of self-archiving on subscription is that there is no effect. Until that changes you shouldn't be surprised that people will bring up physics to counter claims that the sky is falling down.
David C Prosser PhD
Director
SPARC Europe
E-mail: david.prosser@bodley.ox.ac.uk
-----Original Message-----
[mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Sally Morris
(ALPSP)
Sent: 24 July 2006 22:19
To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Subject: Re: Subscription to Open Access Transition
I do wish people would stop trotting out physics as an example
that self archiving does not lead to cancellations. While it has
not done so yet, some physics and mathematics publishers who have
journals replicated more or less in their entirety in arXiv have
made no secret of their concerns, arising from the significant
drop in downloads on the publisher's site. Coupled with evidence
from surveys of librarians that they would, under certain
circumstances, consider cancellation and that usage is an
increasingly significant factor, this adds up to a potentially
alarming scenario. Please can we stop pretending it isn't so?
Sally Morris, Chief Executive
Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers
Email: sally.morris@alpsp.org
- Prev by Date: American Geophysical Union 2007 Journal Subscription Prices
- Next by Date: Re: Subscription to Open Access Transition
- Previous by thread: Re: Subscription to Open Access Transition
- Next by thread: Re: Subscription to Open Access Transition
- Index(es):