[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Oxford Journals release preliminary findings from open access experiments: final report now available online
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Oxford Journals release preliminary findings from open access experiments: final report now available online
- From: "Joseph Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 22:53:27 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Drop the word "conspiracy" and this is exactly right: it is big publishers vs. small, not publishers vs. libraries. Joe Esposito On 6/30/06, Indiana Univ. Math. J. <iumj@indiana.edu> wrote: > When I find a publisher whose print journals are at the (very) > high end of the spectrum *and* which also advocates Open > Access, I ask myself: What's wrong with my brain---why does it > expect coherence...? Maybe there is a vast conspiracy out > there :-) Maybe the "big publishers" advocate OA as a means to > make sure that the small, independent journals go out the > board? > > Would someone care to list all the "big publishers" whose > *majority* of print journals are expensive (take the per page > cost, if you will) and who also advocate OA? > > Best, Elena Fraboschi
- Prev by Date: Re: Open Choice is a Trojan Horse for Open Access Mandates
- Next by Date: Re: PLoS Financial Analysis
- Previous by thread: Re: Oxford Journals release preliminary findings from open access experiments: final report now available online
- Next by thread: A comment (RE: Accession suggestion)
- Index(es):