[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Forthcoming OA Developments in France
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, "AmSci Forum" <american-scientist-open-access-forum@amsci.org>
- Subject: RE: Forthcoming OA Developments in France
- From: "Lisa Dittrich" <lrdittrich@aamc.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:50:13 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I agree, and I think this highlights an issue raised in T. Scott Pluchak's very thoughtful response to PLOS's current financial situation. I personally think the push to OA has come from a few zealots (Varmus and whatever Nobel Laureates he could strong arm into signing his various decrees) and librarians upset about "the serials crisis"--i.e., the higher prices they had to start paying once site licences came along and also, of course, the high prices some journals charge for regular subs (the usual suspects always trotted out to show how outrageously greedy all of us in scholarly publishing are). Most scientists, though, with the possible exception of physicists, have been quite content with the "open access" they already have--namely, the ability to easily get content through their libraries, paid for by their library's budget. I can't tell you how many of the authors I work with who don't even know what the term "open access" means! Granted, my work is with folks who are split between medicine and medical education (so it's social-sciencey) but still. It's not the coin of the realm it is on this list. And they are VERY busy people. So ask them to take one more step after publication--to deposit their research on an NIH database, or even an IR, and most will say "I'll get to that...sometime." As with most other causes, it's those whose livelihoods --the Varmuses and Harnads of the world--and those whose pocketbooks--the librarians and publishers--who are most invested in this issue who get their knickers in a twist over it, as one of my editors used to say. That, and intellectuals w/too much time on their hands. The researchers are busy researching and publishing. Oh, sure, ask them if research should be free, and they'll say yes. Ask most people if "X" should be free, and what do you think they'll say? One other thing: the assumption that all researchers want to share their data is nuts. Remember the fight over who first discovered the AIDS virus? It got pretty ugly. And we've published research in our journal about geneticists holding their findings pretty close to the vest for fear of being scooped. It's not all a love fest in science land, people. Lisa
- Prev by Date: RE: PLoS Financial Analysis
- Next by Date: Re: Joyce estate copyright dispute
- Previous by thread: Re: Forthcoming OA Developments in France
- Next by thread: PLOS Medicine and Impact Factors
- Index(es):