[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Forthcoming OA Developments in France
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, AmSci Forum <american-scientist-open-access-forum@amsci.org>
- Subject: Re: Forthcoming OA Developments in France
- From: Peter Banks <pbanks@bankspub.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:10:32 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
On 6/27/06 9:48 PM, "Stevan Harnad" <harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > Multiple author surveys -- > international and multisciplinary -- as well as repeated > experience with actual mandates have shown that there will be > very high rates of compliance. Really? The NIH had about 4% compliance with its request for voluntary deposit in PMC. The 2005 CIBER author survey concludes, "At the moment, relatively few researchers are familiar with the concept of institutional repositories...such evidence as we have suggests that--at the population level--there is no great interest or drive from the author community for this model." (page 43) Even the Swam paper you cite doesn't suggest high levels of awareness of interest in OA. A slight majority had not placed a paper in an IR, and about three quarters of these didn't even know about repositories. What all the evidence does suggest is that most authors would comply, sometimes grudgingly, with IR deposit if forced to, much as they would comply with the need to pay taxes or get a wisdom tooth extracted. Peter Banks Banks Publishing Publications Consulting and Services pbanks@bankspub.com
- Prev by Date: Re: PLoS Financial Analysis
- Next by Date: Re: Joyce estate copyright dispute
- Previous by thread: Forthcoming OA Developments in France
- Next by thread: Re: Forthcoming OA Developments in France
- Index(es):