[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FW: Open Access Speeds Use by Others
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: FW: Open Access Speeds Use by Others
- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 18:57:54 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Chronicle of Higher Education http://chronicle.com/news/article/438/open-access-speeds-use-by-others-o f-scientific-papers-study-finds "Open Access Speeds Use by Others of Scientific Papers, Study Finds In the continuing debate about open access to scientific literature, the pro-access side gained strength with a study, published this afternoon, that says that, during the first four to 16 months after publication, papers with free access get cited more often than those that require subscriptions. The study appears in an open-access journal, PLoS Biology, and was written by Gunther Eysenbach, of the University of Toronto, who also edits another open-access journal, the Journal of Medical Internet Research." snip Mr. Eysenbach found that the open-access papers were twice as likely as the password-protected articles to be cited four to 10 months after publication, and almost three times as likely from 10 to 16 months afterward. Not yet clear is whether the open-access advantage increases citation in the long run or whether the trend is similar for other journals. The study is at: http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.13 71/journal.pbio.0040157 Chuck Hamaker Associate University Librarian Collections and Technical Services Atkins Library University of North Carolina Charlotte Charlotte, NC 28223
- Prev by Date: RE: Does BMC's business model conflict with Editorial Independence?
- Next by Date: Re: WSJ: NEJM Misses Vioxx Warning Signs
- Previous by thread: Underfund peer review?
- Next by thread: Re: Open Access Speeds Use by Others
- Index(es):