[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On importance
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: On importance
- From: Heather Morrison <heatherm@eln.bc.ca>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:20:06 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Peter Banks writes: The vetting process doesn't appear very stringent. If you look at DOAJ... Others publish content of very modest importance--for example, a paper like "Listening to music decreases need for sedative medication during colonoscopy: A randomized, controlled trial" in the Indian Journal of Gastroenterology. Importance is in the eyes of the beholder. Reducing the need for sedative medication can save lives, and speed recovery. Some would consider these important matters; I know I do! Both outcomes (saving lives, speeding recovery) help to save money for our cash-strapped health systems, too. Here is a link to this important article, in case anyone would like to send this to a local colonoscopist or health administrator: http://tinyurl.com/n6fgu Peter Bank's original message: http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/0605/msg00078.html Heather Morrison http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com
- Prev by Date: RE: Does BMC's business model conflict with Editorial Independence?
- Next by Date: RE: Does BMC's business model conflict with Editorial Independence?
- Previous by thread: RE: Does BMC's business model conflict with Editorial Independence?
- Next by thread: =?GB2312?B?QUQ6R29vZ2xl1tDOxM3GueOw/MTqNDgwxvA=?=
- Index(es):