[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Does BMC's business model conflict with Editorial Independence?
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Does BMC's business model conflict with Editorial Independence?
- From: <matt@biomedcentral.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:15:20 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Phil, BioMed Central's independent journal editors are, in general, responsible for all aspects of administering peer-review on their journal. As an independent journal grows and publishes more research, this effectively means the editors are each running a small editorial office. Clearly, the costs associated with running that office will tend to scale in proportion to the number of articles published. This is why BioMed Central's payments to independent journal editors are generally proportionate to the number of articles pubished. That is the nature of open access publishing. The suggestion that open access journal editors are conflicted because their journal's revenue depends on article processing charges is really just the same old suggestion that open access journals in general are conflicted by article processing charges. But as has been widely pointed out, if that is a conflict of interest, then all journals with page charges have that same conflict of interest. And since traditional publishers justify subscription price increases based on the increasing page count of their journals, traditional publishers too face the very same potential conflict of interest. See: <http://www.biomedcentral.com/openaccess/inquiry/myths/?myth=integrity> In fact, the stronger argument is in the opposite direction - because open access journals are generally less reliant on reprint revenue than traditional journals, there are many potential conflicts of interest that they avoid. See for example: <http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020138> Matt Cockerill Publisher, BioMed Central > -----Original Message----- > From: Phil Davis [mailto:pmd8@cornell.edu] > Sent: 10 May 2006 16:26 > Subject: Does BMC's business model conflict with Editorial > Independence? > > Matt Cockerill at BMC wrote: > "In fact, according to the terms of the new agreement (under which > more than half of BioMed Central's independent titles operate), > journal editors *do* receive payment, in the form of a share of the > revenue from article processing charges for their journal." > > Response: > I am not a medical journal editor, but this statement by the > publisher of BioMed Central seems to have direct conflicts with > Editorial Independence, and leads one to suspect whether BMC editors > have financial conflicts of interest that prevent them from > exercising good judgement. [SNIP]
- Prev by Date: Re: Institutional Journal Costs in an Open Access Environment
- Next by Date: Re: Open Access Priorities: Lay Public Access or Researcher Access?
- Previous by thread: Does BMC's business model conflict with Editorial Independence?
- Next by thread: RE: Does BMC's business model conflict with Editorial Independence?
- Index(es):