[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: RCUK policy on open access
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, "American Scientist Open Access Forum" <AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM@LISTSERVER.SIGMAXI.ORG>
- Subject: RE: RCUK policy on open access
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:13:21 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
It is not useful to complain about the actions (or non-action) of governmental and quasi-governmental bodies. They are not primarily concerned with either the promotion or the diffusion of academic research. Academic administrators should be so concerned, but centuries of experience has shown otherwise. There are of course honorable exceptions that prove action possible --the Wellcome, CERN, and a handful of universities, such as Queensland). I doubt any of us agrees with all the details of any of these, but nonethess they have achieved the key point--essentially 100% OA for the publications within their control. Preliminary expressions showing correct understanding and even general agreement do not make a policy. Why should anyone have expected more from the RCUK than another study? Those who wait for positive implementation from such sources will indeed become "Impatient Archivangelist[s]" Dr. David Goodman Palmer School of Library and Information Science Long Island University dgoodman@liu.edu dgoodman@princeton.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Institutional Journal Costs in an Open Access Environment
- Next by Date: Re: Institutional Journal Costs in an Open Access Environment
- Previous by thread: Re: RCUK policy on open access
- Index(es):