[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Dramatic growth of open access
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Dramatic growth of open access
- From: "Martin Frank" <mfrank@The-APS.org>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 21:16:38 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Why is there a need to post a list of OA articles in our journals? All one has to do is go to the TOC for the journal and one sees an open tag (or "lock") on articles that are open and free for reading. APS does that for articles for which the author has paid an OA fee. Should we also do this for articles that become free after an embargo period? Should we post a list of those articles somewhere other than in the journal's TOC? I am proud of how we function as a publisher, providing access in a timely manner, facilitating the needs of patients to access content, and encouraging the development of the scientific enterprise in developing countries through collaboration with Hinari and Agora. marty Martin Frank, Ph.D. Executive Director American Physiological Society 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20814-3991 Tel: 301-634-7118 Fax: 301-634-7241 Email: mfrank@The-APS.org APS Home Page: http://www.The-APS.org/ >>> David.Goodman@liu.edu 04/13/06 7:41 PM >>> I expand on Matt's remark about the difficulty of even obtaining basic data. It would be very useful if the publishers of journals with occasional OA articles were to post lists of those published. Asssuming that they engage in such a manner of publication in the hope of providing at least some OA, they ought to want to display their success. Dr. David Goodman Associate Professor Palmer School of Library and Information Science Long Island University dgoodman@liu.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of matt@biomedcentral.com Sent: Wed 4/12/2006 8:12 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Dramatic growth of open access ... A better approach would be to analyse the number of immediate open access articles published year on year. This is challenging to do, not least because several years on it is very difficult to be sure what *was* open access at the moment of publication. But that is really the metric that counts. Matthew Cockerill, Ph.D. Publisher BioMed Central ( http://www.biomedcentral.com/ ) London, UK Email: matt@biomedcentral.com
- Prev by Date: RE: Dramatic growth of open access
- Next by Date: Two Open Access Books on Open Access
- Previous by thread: RE: Dramatic growth of open access
- Next by thread: Dramatic Growth of Open Access
- Index(es):