[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads?
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads?
- From: Phil Davis <pmd8@cornell.edu>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:38:24 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Stevan Harnad wrote:
"The full text of Phil Davis's paper is not yet accessible, so I can only respond to the abstract...."
The fulltext of the article is available, and I urge those who have knee-jerk reactions based on the abstract alone to please read the article. I agree that this article challenges the central orthodoxy that Open Access causes more citations. Based on our analysis, we found that a quality differential is a more plausible explanation -- the reason why arXiv-deposited articles receive more citations is simply because they are better articles, not because of some advantage conveyed through increased access. If Open Access can explain the citation advantage (and we did confirm one), it is only responsible for giving an advantage to already highly-cited articles.
Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for
mathematics articles?
Authors: Philip M. Davis, Michael J. Fromerth
http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0603056
- Prev by Date: Ingenta appoints Louise Tutton in new Head of Client Management ro=
- Next by Date: Re: Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads?
- Previous by thread: Ingenta appoints Louise Tutton in new Head of Client Management ro=
- Next by thread: Re: Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads?
- Index(es):