[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Survey on literature use
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Survey on literature use
- From: Richard Feinman <RFeinman@downstate.edu>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:56:01 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I thought the list might be interested in a paper I am currently writing based on the results of a survey of an online support group of low carbohydrate dieters, The Active Low-Carbers Forum ( http://forum.lowcarber.org/ ). Although the primary focus of the study was the behavior and attitudes with respect to nutrition, we also asked about ?sources important to you in selecting a diet and in understanding nutrition in relation to your diet.? The results (below) are as expected for a group following a strategy generally considered outside of the mainstream of recommended medical and nutritional practice, that is, they did not put much stock in official sources. However, half of the 3,168 respondents said that they felt that original scientific publications were somewhat or very important. On the question of access to the scientific literature, this sub-group had the opinion: * Generally inadequate access (important articles not accessible): 360 (20%) * Adequate (was able to see most articles I wanted): 1085 (61%) * More than adequate (could not read everything that was available): 322 (18%) The respondents were mostly significantly overweight women and access to the survey required joining the forum so it is a fairly serious group. However, we did not distiguish professions, so an unknown number of academics (including me) who would have professional interest in the original literature is included. (I believe I checked Adequate although I think adequate is not good enough for professional science). Source Not important Somewhat important Very important Popular books 24 40 37 TV or other media 71 24 5 Manufacturers websites (Atkins, etc) 35 40 25 Private health associations (ADA, etc) 74 20 7 Online support forums 10 29 61 Government websites/publications 76 19 4 Original scientific publications 50 34 16 Anyone interested in the results can see our preliminary report (first author: Mavropoulos) at http://www.nmsociety.org/postersdisplay06.htm Richard D. Feinman, Professor of Biochemistry
- Prev by Date: re: R & D & library spending
- Next by Date: BASE - new release, links to Google Scholar
- Previous by thread: re: R & D & library spending
- Next by thread: BASE - new release, links to Google Scholar
- Index(es):