[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: The religion of peer review
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: The religion of peer review
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:43:24 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
It is not necessary to rely on argumentation and personal experiences on the topic of peer review. Unlike many of the problems we must deal with, there is considerable evidence of a high scientific standard, nicely summarized by T. jefferson et al. in JAMA v.287(21) June 5, 2002 p 2786-90, + online tables. This is part of a comprehensive Peer Review Congress constituting almost all of that issue, p. 2759- 2871 + online tables, all available OA at http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/vol287/issue21/index.dtl Those wishing to contribute opinions or anecdotes should first read the evidence. Dr. David Goodman Associate Professor Palmer School of Library and Information Science Long Island University dgoodman@liu.edu
- Prev by Date: The Bottom Line On Open Access (University Affairs, 1 March 2006)
- Next by Date: Re: The religion of peer review
- Previous by thread: Re: The religion of peer review
- Next by thread: Re: The religion of peer review
- Index(es):