[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EPA Set to Close Library Network and Electronic Catalog
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: EPA Set to Close Library Network and Electronic Catalog
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:59:22 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
It is unavoidable that research in many fields depends on government funding. It is unavoidable that some parts of the information chain such as national libraries and copyright offices require centralized government operation. But Peter is right that the preservation of published scientific information should not be under the control of any one organization, certainly not a government because of the interference of politics, usually mediated by publishers, not a public university, dependent upon state funding, not a private university, whose priorities may change any time, not individual learned societies, whose fiscal stability is uncertain, not a commercial publisher, subject to change in ownership, and bankruptcy. This leaves only arrangements with the material in multiple decentralized locations--and open to individuals who wish to mirror, as many will. The possibility of such arrangements obviously depend upon open access. Then, with the material downloaded, it does not matter what happens to PMC, NIH, the United States government, journals, publishers, or libraries. Those who understand the implication of what Peter says, must agree with the need for OA. Let us first of all fill the archives, as a colleague puts it. Dr. David Goodman Associate Professor Palmer School of Library and Information Science Long Island University and formerly Princeton University Library dgoodman@liu.edu dgoodman@princeton.edu ----- Original Message ----- From: Peter Banks <pbanks@diabetes.org> Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 7:42 pm Subject: Re: EPA Set to Close Library Network and Electronic Catalog To: cahamake@email.uncc.edu, liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > This may point out the irony of believing that the federal > government is the best entity for the stable, long-term > preservation of literature--a belief that underlies the current > NIH policy. The proposed FY07 NIH budget does not raise > confidence in the long-term stability of federal funding for > document preservation. > > Peter Banks > Publisher > American Diabetes Association > Email: pbanks@diabetes.org > >>>> cahamake@email.uncc.edu 02/17/06 8:34 PM >>> > http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=643 > > Under G.Bush Jr.'s proposed budget, the U.S. Environmental > Protection Agency is slated to shut down its network of libraries > that serve its own scientists as well as the public, according to > internal agency documents released today by Public Employees for > Environmental Responsibility (PEER). In addition to the > libraries, the agency will pull the plug on its electronic > catalog which tracks tens of thousands of unique documents and > research studies that are available nowhere else." > > Chuck Hamaker > Associate University Librarian Collections and Technical Services > Atkins Library > University of North Carolina Charlotte > Charlotte, NC 28223 > phone 704 687-2825
- Prev by Date: Re: The religion of peer review
- Next by Date: Copyright extension - "big mistake"
- Previous by thread: RE: EPA Set to Close Library Network and Electronic Catalog
- Next by thread: RE: EPA Set to Close Library Network and Electronic Catalog
- Index(es):