[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does More Mean More?
- To: <sh94r@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Does More Mean More?
- From: "Peter Banks" <pbanks@diabetes.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 19:10:18 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Though I agree that filtering need not be the exclusive province of journals, filtering is more than peer review, and the filtering that journals do is not yet antique. In addition to peer review and the assurance of quality, filtering also involves the aggregation of content relevant to a particular community, the selection and presentation of the canonical version of manuscripts, and the conferring of professional recognition on author-researchers. Though some OA journals (PLOS Biology, say) perform these functions quite well, OA models as a whole do not. That's not to say they can't in the future; it may simply be that currently the emphasis is on the broad distribution of information rather than on the careful filtering of information. That said, there is no doubt that the relevance and role of journals in the filtering process will change and evolve. (Publishers like me had better change and evolve--or else go into an easier field, like hazardous waste disposal, say. ) Peter Banks Publisher American Diabetes Association Email: pbanks@diabetes.org >>> sh94r@ecs.soton.ac.uk 02/06/06 10:04 PM >>> The idea that "readers want the journal to do the filtering for them" is really quite quaint, it seems to me. Perhaps not surprisingly, as Sally mentions the term 'paper'. We need to be careful about terminology here. In the electronic environment journals do *peer review* rather than filter. If you want to see what electronic filters are, see e.g. Citeseer, Google Scholar. In these services peer review and associated journal titles are labels (tags), more or less important depending on the user, that go into the filter mix. The changing role of journals in the overall scheme of filtering and selection is a fascinating and critical point of enquiry, but the old points of reference in this discussion are completely inadequate. Steve Hitchcock IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK Email: sh94r@ecs.soton.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 3256 Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865
- Prev by Date: German coalition for action
- Next by Date: Is Peer Review Broken?
- Previous by thread: RE: Does More Mean More?
- Next by thread: RE: Does More Mean More?
- Index(es):