[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does More Mean More?
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Does More Mean More?
- From: "William Walsh" <libwdw@langate.gsu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:23:30 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
It is ironic given that as recently as November 2005, a major publisher was telling investors that one of the attractive features of their science and technology business was "increasing research article output +3%." Bill William Walsh Head, Acquisitions Department Georgia State University Library 100 Decatur Street, SE Atlanta, GA 30303 >>> ucylfjf@ucl.ac.uk 01/29/06 8:09 PM >>> It is ironic that publishers are now claiming to be the guardians of quantity. Since World War 2 the number of journals published by subscription publishers has increased dramatically. Anyway the main driver for quantity of publication is not the business model but the quantity of research undertaken by the academic community. Fred Friend JISC Scholarly Communication Consultant Honorary Director Scholarly Communication UCL
- Prev by Date: RE: Does More Mean More?
- Next by Date: Brill completes acquisition of IDC Publishers
- Previous by thread: RE: Does More Mean More?
- Next by thread: Quality clauses, or diminishing quality of non-OA
- Index(es):