[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Open Data and E-Research: the Revolution in Information
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Open Data and E-Research: the Revolution in Information
- From: Poetic Economics Heather <heatherm@eln.bc.ca>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:20:13 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Open Data and E-Research: the Revolution in Creation, Collection, and Use of Information A revolution is quietly occurring in the way information resources can be created, collected, and used. It is now possible to capture the data from research itself, using techniques which collect the data directly from the instruments. The data can then be linked to published results, as well as used by other researchers, often in new ways. Are collections librarians beginning to connect their users to the new resources, and alert them to the new possibilities? Cambridge's Dr. Peter Murray-Rust did a fascinating presentation - the half hour webcast of "Open data in science - technical and cultural aspects" - is free to download, and worth every second of watching: http://indico.cern.ch/sessionDisplay.py?sessionId=9&slotId=0&confId=0514#200 5-10-22 (So are the other presentations in this session of OAI4, and all the OAI4 presentations, for that matter). After watching this webcast, I'm sure that you will agree with me that a system that involves printing out born-electronic information, using a ruler to measure and create tables, then carefully copying - and copyediting - the tables - is ludicrous in a day and age when we can capture the data directly. Publishing open data is both a very great deal more useful, and MORE accurate than current methods. Peter also shows Oscar, a program developed by undergrads which peer-reviews chemical compound information BETTER than humans. The revolution in information production and dissemination of our times, in my opinion, is every bit as fundamental a change as the invention of the printing press. Before the printing press, we did have quality control mechanisms in place - careful handcopying by carefully trained monks, and so forth. Their services were very appropriately valued. However, once the printing press was invented, wouldn't it have been silly to carry on this way? Heather G. Morrison http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com
- Prev by Date: Re: Does More Mean More?
- Next by Date: Re: Does More Mean More?
- Previous by thread: Clauses for early termination
- Next by thread: Brill completes acquisition of IDC Publishers
- Index(es):