[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open Letter about OA to the Royal Society by Fellows ofthe Royal Society
- To: <american-scientist-open-access-forum@amsci.org>, <harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Open Letter about OA to the Royal Society by Fellows ofthe Royal Society
- From: "Marc Brodsky" <brodsky@aip.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 18:02:54 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I would say a careful reading of the two statements show more balance and openness in the RSC statement than in the response letter cited below by Harnad. I would suggest that we explore new venues for dissemination of information before first setting out to undermine successful existing ones. If the new venues work for authors and readers, we will not need government imposed mandates to make them happen. Marc Marc H. Brodsky Executive Director and CEO E-mail: brodsky@aip.org American Institute of Physics Phone: (301) 209-3131 One Physics Ellipse Fax: (301) 209-3133 College Park, MD 20740-3843 >>> harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk 12/6/2005 7:49 PM >>> Forty two Fellows of the Royal Society (including 5 Nobel Laureates) have signed the following Open Letter to Lord Martin Rees expressing concern about the Society's statement on open access: http://www.frsopenletter.org/
- Prev by Date: Re: DASER 2 IR Meeting and NIH Public Access Policy
- Next by Date: Re: On the distinction between for-profit and non-profit
- Previous by thread: Re: The Ultimate Online Pharmaceutical
- Next by thread: Re: Open Letter about OA to the Royal Society by Fellows ofthe Royal Society
- Index(es):