[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open Letter about OA to the Royal Society by Fellows ofthe Royal Society
- To: <american-scientist-open-access-forum@amsci.org>, <harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
 - Subject: Re: Open Letter about OA to the Royal Society by Fellows ofthe Royal Society
 - From: "Marc Brodsky" <brodsky@aip.org>
 - Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 18:02:54 EST
 - Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
 - Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
 
I would say a careful reading of the two statements show more balance and 
openness in the RSC statement than in the response letter cited below by 
Harnad.
I would suggest that we explore new venues for dissemination of 
information before first setting out to undermine successful existing 
ones.
If the new venues work for authors and readers, we will not need 
government imposed mandates to make them happen. Marc
Marc H. Brodsky
Executive Director and CEO		E-mail: brodsky@aip.org
American Institute of Physics 	                Phone: (301) 209-3131
One Physics Ellipse 			Fax: (301) 209-3133
College Park, MD 20740-3843
>>> harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk 12/6/2005 7:49 PM >>>
Forty two Fellows of the Royal Society (including 5 Nobel Laureates) have
signed the following Open Letter to Lord Martin Rees expressing concern
about the Society's statement on open access:
      http://www.frsopenletter.org/
- Prev by Date: Re: DASER 2 IR Meeting and NIH Public Access Policy
 - Next by Date: Re: On the distinction between for-profit and non-profit
 - Previous by thread: Re: The Ultimate Online Pharmaceutical
 - Next by thread: Re: Open Letter about OA to the Royal Society by Fellows ofthe Royal Society
 - Index(es):
 
