[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Functioning IRs - today's real realities
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Functioning IRs - today's real realities
- From: Ann Okerson <aokerson@pantheon.yale.edu>
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:23:55 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Steve: You are describing a set of fairly brief comments I made on a conference panel a couple of months ago. I noted that when an institution wants and needs a substantial IR, with ability to handle numerous types of complicated data and documents, in size and scale, in service to numerous projects and individuals across the university, and so on (see the URL with the text), one has to make a sizeable investment to get all that. If the needs are simpler, the costs will be lower and turnkey solutions are indeed available, from eprints, BMC, ProQuest, and probably others. Sincerely, Ann Okerson/Yale Library
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Steve Hitchcock wrote:
*Cross posted* Ann Okerson has published a curiously-titled short note about IRs in the latest issue of INASP Newsletter: Institutional repositories - today's realities http://www.inasp.info/newslet/nov05.shtml#8 In it she lists an extended range of functions for an IR, then admits there are currently no turnkey solutions to support this list, only partial solutions, and that this specification is costly: "three-year start-up costs for hardware and software alone are over $300,000", without including staff costs apparently. This is surely way beyond the costs supportable by INASP's constituency, and probably most other institutions too who just want to get an IR up and running quickly at low cost. Today's realities are quite different. There is an alternative that will provide a functioning IR to capture and make accessible all the research outputs of an institution at a fraction of Ann's quoted cost. It's based on EPrints, the original IR software, a focussed IR solution that works now, but isn't mentioned in Ann's note. Although EPrints is free, open source software, there are costs attached to running an IR, but institutions should not be put off by excessive cost projections. To prove it the newly launched EPrints Services team offers a range of service packages from supporting local hosting to a fully hosted service http://www.eprints.org/services/sales/ This approach also goes some way to reducing an institution's risk on costs. To understand why IRs are needed and how to build one, Professor Arthur Sale, a developer of software to measure usage of IRs, offers a practical approach http://www.eprints.org/news/features/worlds_best_practice.php Ann is not alone in advocating more complex and costly DL-inspired functionality for IRs, and it will arrive, but these investigations can be left to others for now. This is how Arthur Sale puts it: "Can people fly flags and ring bells over conquering Everest when it turns out to be Highgate Hill?" Steve Hitchcock EPrints Community Manager IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK Email: sh94r@ecs.soton.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 3256 Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865 http://www.eprints.org/community/
- Prev by Date: Serials: for the international Serials Community
- Next by Date: Re: Taking Our Academic Medicine
- Previous by thread: Functioning IRs - today's real realities
- Next by thread: Remove my E-mail address from your list
- Index(es):