[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Taking Our Academic Medicine
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <mefunk@med.cornell.edu>
- Subject: Re: Taking Our Academic Medicine
- From: "Peter Banks" <pbanks@diabetes.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:06:23 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The real "myth" is the timesome one you put forth here--that peer review is conducted by unpaid volunteers. For a journal of any size and stature, it isn't. Yes, reviewers are unpaid. But the university based editors and associate editors who invite, manage and reconcile the conflicting views of those invited reviewers are paid, and well. For a journal like Diabetes, costs at the university (including rent, salary support, supplies, etc) are $250,000 per year, minimum. Peter Banks Acting Vice President for Publications/Publisher American Diabetes Association Email: pbanks@diabetes.org >>> mefunk@med.cornell.edu 11/28/05 6:09 PM >>> Besides smearing the peer reviewers for Open Access journals, this comment also perpetuates the myth that traditional publishers employ a more expensive peer review process. Peer review, a most important aspect of the publishing process, is mostly done by invited volunteers. Very few scientific journals have paid, in-house reviewers. It is these unpaid volunteers, chosen for their expertise, who assure the quality and authority of academic journals, whether Open Access or not. I fail to see how "unpaid" is more expensive for traditional journals than it is for Open Access journals. Copy editing, used by some journals and not others, is not peer review. I'm not sure the "trained monkey" reviewers for BMC, PLoS, and other Open Access journals appreciate your comment. Mark Funk Head, Collection Development Weill Cornell Medical Library New York, NY 10021 mefunk@med.cornell.edu ___ At 12:01 AM -0500 11/20/05, Peter Banks wrote: >However, what authors want from journals is the rigor of peer review and >the stamp of authority it conveys. And that--despite the OA assertion that >peer review can be done cheaply, perhaps by trained monkeys in a low-rent >trailer in South Dakota--is where the cost, and the value, enters >publishing. "Value" is not low price, as you will find if you buy your >wife's Christmas gift at WalMart rather than Tiffany. For a journal, it is >the cost to deliver quality, authority, and distribution.
- Prev by Date: Perspectives on Politics article mentioned on NPR's Morning Edition, Monday, 11/28/05
- Next by Date: Email News Release: Wiley Expands STM Publishing in Asia
- Previous by thread: Re: Taking Our Academic Medicine
- Next by thread: unscribe me
- Index(es):