[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Response from Ted Bergstrom to Ann Okerson
- To: Peter Banks <pbanks@diabetes.org>
- Subject: Re: Response from Ted Bergstrom to Ann Okerson
- From: Karl Bridges <Karl.Bridges@uvm.edu>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:17:45 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I guess this leads to my next question. If it's a problem to discuss this in a listserv why are people doing it at conferences and why, if that happened, did not the publishers in the room complain about it? Quoting Peter Banks <pbanks@diabetes.org>: > It definitely is potential restraint of trade--and dicussion of pricing > on this, or any, list-serve, would be very unwise (most moderators slap > the hands of those who even hint at discussion of pricing). > > Peter Banks > Acting Vice President for Publications/Publisher > American Diabetes Association > Email: pbanks@diabetes.org > >>>> karl.bridges@uvm.edu 11/09/05 6:23 PM >>> > My question is whether this is legal. First, many libraries do have > nondisclosure agreements that would prevent them from doing this. > Second, isn't this something like restraint of trade? A group of > businesses (libraries) getting together to collude to decide what prices > they will accept-- with the idea obviously of lowering prices. > Personally, I'd hesitate to participate in such an arrangement unless my > university counsel told me that I wouldn't be running afoul of laws > about interfering with interstate trade.
- Prev by Date: RE: Secret pricing (RE: Response from Ted Bergstrom to Ann Okerson)
- Next by Date: RE: Response from Ted Bergstrom to Ann Okerson
- Previous by thread: RE: Response from Ted Bergstrom to Ann Okerson
- Next by thread: RE: Response from Ted Bergstrom to Ann Okerson
- Index(es):