[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Secret pricing (RE: Response from Ted Bergstrom to Ann Okerson)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Secret pricing (RE: Response from Ted Bergstrom to Ann Okerson)
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:50:57 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> In the same way, librarians are reluctant to share pricing information > (and willfully accept confidentiality clauses) if they believe if they > are getting a "good deal" from the publishers. Which, if you think about it, is really pretty silly. If we all agree to keep our pricing secret, how does any individual library know that it's getting a better-than-average deal? It seems equally likely that you're getting a worse-than-average deal. After all, everyone can't get a better deal than everyone else; if Library A is getting an artificially low price, then somewhere there's a Library B whose price is higher than it would have been if the pricing were standardized and publicly known. Sales reps want us all to think that we're the Library A, of course -- but if prices are secret, we have no way of knowing that we're not actually the Library B. ---- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries (775) 784-6500 x273 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: GooglePriint unique identifiers?
- Next by Date: RE: GooglePriint unique identifiers?
- Previous by thread: GooglePriint unique identifiers?
- Next by thread: RE: Secret pricing (RE: Response from Ted Bergstrom to Ann Okerson)
- Index(es):