[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The Number That's Devouring Science
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: The Number That's Devouring Science
- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:43:23 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Chronicle of Higher Education >From the issue dated October 14, 2005 http://chronicle.com/weekly/v52/i08/08a01201.htm (must have subscription to access article) The Number That's Devouring Science The impact factor, once a simple way to rank scientific journals, has become an unyielding yardstick for hiring, tenure, and grants By RICHARD MONASTERSKY In the beginning, during the late 1950s, it was just an innocent idea in Eugene Garfield's head. A Philadelphia researcher who described himself as a "documentation consultant," Mr. Garfield spent his free time thinking about scientific literature and how to mine information from it. He eventually dreamed up something he called an "impact factor," essentially a grading system for journals, that could help him pick out the most important publications from the ranks of lesser titles. To identify which journals mattered most to scientists, he proposed tallying up the number of citations an average article in each journal received. This accounting method sounds harmless enough. Outside academe, few people have even heard of it. Mr. Garfield, though, now compares his brainchild to nuclear energy: a force that can help society but can unleash mayhem when it is misused. Indeed, impact factors have assumed so much power, especially in the past five years, that they are starting to control the scientific enterprise. In Europe, Asia, and, increasingly, the United States, Mr. Garfield's tool can play a crucial role in hiring, tenure decisions, and the awarding of grants. "The impact factor may be a pox upon the land because of the abuse of that number," says Robert H. Austin, a professor of physics at Princeton University. Impact-factor fever is spreading, threatening to skew the course of scientific research, say critics. Investigators are now more likely to chase after fashionable topics - the kind that get into high-impact journals - than to follow important avenues that may not be the flavor of the year, says Yu-Li Wang, a professor of physiology at the University of Massachusetts Medical School. "It influences a lot of people's research direction." SEE LINK FOR REST OF ARTICLE. Subscription required. ####
- Prev by Date: AIP Publishes First Open Access Article
- Next by Date: Change of direction
- Previous by thread: AIP Publishes First Open Access Article
- Next by thread: Re: The Number That's Devouring Science
- Index(es):