[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Open access: a must for Wellcome Trust researchers
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Open access: a must for Wellcome Trust researchers
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 20:39:03 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Neither libraries nor researchers are stupid. Scientists will develop publishing methods suitable to their needs. We have no reason to predict that they will be inferior. If they truly want peer review, there are multiple ways to acomplish this independent of the nature of the dissemination. Why should we assume that the existing institutional arrangements are the highest attainable peak of perfection, either technical or economic? Dr. David Goodman Associate Professor Palmer School of Library and Information Science Long Island University dgoodman@liu.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of Joseph J. Esposito Sent: Wed 10/5/2005 8:55 AM Subject: Re: Open access: a must for Wellcome Trust researchers... . In the middle term, as the amount of OA content grows, we will see the availability of OA articles influence decisions to cancel certain subscriptions (why pay for what you can get free?--and, I insist, contrary to the assumption of so many OA advocates, librarians are not stupid), starting with third-tier journals and moving inexorably into second-tier ones. (I doubt the first tier have anything to fear for quite a while.) In a declining market, less capital will be invested in new journals and the appetite to underwrite peer review will diminish. With fewer formal channels available to publish research, research which will continue to grow year by year, more researchers will publish informally, with little or no formal peer review process. This will result in a mass of research literature findable by Google, and it will initiate new forms of post-publication (more properly, "post-posting") peer review. There will be new costs attendant to this, and entrepreneurs will identify ways to serve this evolving market. They always do. What OA leads to, then, is the deterioration of the legacy publishing industry, the growth of unsifted materials on the Net, the disintermediation of libraries (via Google et al), and a suite of new business opportunities. ... Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: LC Awards $3M to Portico
- Next by Date: Re: Open access: a must for Wellcome Trust researchers
- Previous by thread: RE: Open access: a must for Wellcome Trust researchers
- Next by thread: Re: Open access: a must for Wellcome Trust researchers
- Index(es):