[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- From: "Stuivenga, Will" <wstuivenga@secstate.wa.gov>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:05:26 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
One might ask the same question from the other side: What if it were OCLC and/or ALA that were doing it? Or the Library of Congress? Will Stuivenga wstuivenga@secstate.wa.gov Project Manager, Statewide Database Licensing (SDL) Washington State Library Division, OSOS 360.704.5217 fax: 360.586.7575 -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Philip Cadigan Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 3:30 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open <SNIP> Personally, I think that the Google digitization project will be great. My hesitation is that I wonder how would people feel about the project if some greedy publisher was behind it. And if they felt differently, then what's the reasoning that we should make special allowances for Google? Philip Cadigan PbType LLC http://pbtype.com Vox: 617-314-6508 Fax: 617-314-6586
- Prev by Date: Re: Maximising the Return on UK's Public Investment in Research
- Next by Date: Re: Open access to research worth A3 1.5bn a year
- Previous by thread: Re: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- Next by thread: Re: Open access to research worth �1.5bn a year
- Index(es):