[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- From: Liblicense-L Listowner <liblicen@pantheon.yale.edu>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:05:52 -0400 (EDT)
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Of possible interest. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: EFF Press <press@eff.org> Date: September 21, 2005 4:03:29 PM EDT To: presslist@eff.org Subject: [E-B] EFF: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open Electronic Frontier Foundation Media Release For Immediate Release: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 Contact: Fred von Lohmann Senior Intellectual Property Attorney Electronic Frontier Foundation fred@eff.org +1 415 436-9333 x123 (office), +1 415 215-6087 (cell) Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open San Francisco, CA - Yesterday, the Authors Guild filed a class-action copyright infringement suit against Google over its Google Print library project. Working with major university libraries, Google Print aims to make thousands of books searchable via the Web, allowing people to search for key words or phrases in books. The public may browse the full text of public domain materials in the process of such a search, but only a few sentences of text around the search term in books still covered by copyright. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) applauds Google's effort to create the digital equivalent of a library card catalog, and believes the company has a strong case. "Just as libraries don't need to pay publishers when they create a card catalog, neither should Google or other search engines be required to when they create an improved digital equivalent," said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Fred von Lohmann. In defending the lawsuit, Google is relying on the copyright principle of fair use, which allows the public to copy works without having to ask permission or pay licensing fees to copyright holders. EFF believes Google is likely to prevail on its defense. One key point in Google's favor is that Google Print is a transformative use of these books -- the company is creating a virtual card catalog to assist people in finding relevant books, rather than creating replacements for the books themselves. In addition, it is almost certain that Google Print will boost, rather than hurt, the market for the copyrighted books. "It's easy to see how Google Print can stimulate demand for books that otherwise would lay undiscovered in library stacks," said von Lohmann. "It's hard to see how it could hurt publishers or authors." For additional legal analysis, EFF recommends the white paper, "The Google Print Library Project: A Copyright Analysis," recently published by noted DC copyright attorney Jonathan Band of Policy Bandwidth. The Google Print Library Project: A Copyright Analysis: http://www.policybandwidth.com/doc/googleprint.pdf For this release: http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2005_09.php#003994 About EFF The Electronic Frontier Foundation is the leading civil liberties organization working to protect rights in the digital world. Founded in 1990, EFF actively encourages and challenges industry and government to support free expression and privacy online. EFF is a member-supported organization and maintains one of the most linked-to websites in the world at http://www.eff.org/ -end-
- Prev by Date: Blackwell Publishing Donates Textbooks to Ethiopian Medical Schools
- Next by Date: Re: Open access to research worth �1.5bn a year
- Previous by thread: Re: Open access to research worth �1.5bn a year
- Next by thread: RE: Google's Card Catalog Should Be Left Open
- Index(es):