[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AAP/Google in Chronicle of Higher Education
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: AAP/Google in Chronicle of Higher Education
- From: "Bolick, Bob" <Bob_Bolick@mcgraw-hill.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:52:11 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Hi, Chuck -- Let me take a shot at explaining where the publishers are coming from on the copyright point. On the innovation front, almost all of us are cheering and want to figure out for ourselves, our shareholders, our authors, and other allied stakeholders how best (legally and respectfully) to foster this sort of innovation. But in general, this is a situation where ends do not justify means. The benefits of the exclusive reproduction right provided in Section 106(1) of the Copyright Act means that simply making a copy of a copyright-protected work infringes the copyright owner's right to control reproduction, even if the copy is not distributed or displayed. The qualification of the rights of a copyright owner by "fair use" privilege or other statutory limitations do not vitiate the exclusive reproduction right. To put it another way, if you must copy and store in your databases every work in its entirety in order to use so-called "snippets," then it ain't fair use. If the law were otherwise interpreted and applied, the reproduction right would be meaningless except in cases where the distribution, performance or display rights were also implicated by proven conduct. Neither Congress nor any federal court has ever suggested this result. In specifically providing a reproduction right, the copyright law reasonably assumes that people do not make copies of a copyright-protected work without intending to use the copy in some manner, and that the ready ability of the copier or anyone else who has access to the copies to use them in a manner that could implicate other rights of the copyright owner justifies restricting the right to make such copies without the copyright owner's authorization or some other specific authorization under the law. So, unauthorized scanning is indeed itself an issue with Google or any other person or entity that makes copies of copyright-protected works in their entirety without permission from the copyright owner or authorization under a specific provision of federal law. Hope that helps. Regards, Bob Robert Bolick Vice President Global Business Planning McGraw-Hill Education 2 Penn Plaza, 25th Floor, New York, NY 10121 (O) 212.904.5934 (M) 646.431.8121 IM: bobb@nexus.eppg.com IM: b6b2y@aol.com Internet ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.1570/b01b01b
- Prev by Date: News from Xrefer: Xrefer and Paratext Team Up for Library Reference Delivery
- Next by Date: RE: AAP/Google in Chronicle of Higher Education
- Previous by thread: RE: AAP/Google in Chronicle of Higher Education
- Next by thread: RE: AAP/Google in Chronicle of Higher Education
- Index(es):