[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: restrictive license clause
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: restrictive license clause
- From: Elizabeth_R_Lorbeer@rush.edu
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:16:32 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Dear Jill, I have seen similar wording for database/online aggregators who produce or resell products on behalf of third parties. Since the aggregator does not collect the data, and only provides the means to search and view content, it’s in their favor to include a clause that gives them the right to cease production. Questions I suggest you ask the Licensor is if a contract exists between the third party and aggregator. If so, what are the general terms of the agreement, such as the number of years the aggregator has the right to sell and display the content. Is there data or content that the aggregator does not have rights to publish which may be missing from the product, i.e. Letters to the Editor or Supplements? Is there a morality clause in place? (“…or is defamatory, obscene, unlawful or otherwise objectionable.”) From the aggregator's answers, you’ll be able to make your decision to accept the clause as is or add specific language to protect your institution’s rights during the duration of the agreement. Note with such wording, the license is often silent about archival rights. Sincerely, Liz Lorbeer, Collection Development Manager Library - Rush University Medical Center Chicago, IL 60612 Elizabeth_R_Lorbeer@rush.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: restrictive license clause
- Next by Date: Triangle Journals Ltd
- Previous by thread: Re: restrictive license clause
- Next by thread: RE: restrictive license clause
- Index(es):