[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NIH as publisher
- To: Michael Carroll <Carroll@law.villanova.edu>
- Subject: Re: NIH as publisher
- From: Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:58:50 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I disagree. This activity is handled well by the private sector. This is a waste of government money. Why re-create the wheel? I would rather see this money go toward things that the private sector does poorly, like universal health care or public schools. Joe Esposito On 6/2/05, Michael Carroll <Carroll@law.villanova.edu> wrote: > Please take a look at what's being published before you fly off the > handle. PubChem is a database of factual information, chemical > compounds and the like, that is in the *public domain*. See > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=DisplayFiltered&DB=pccompound > > Gathering and organizing public domain information that speeds > publicly-funded biomedical research is a perfectly legitimate public > function. > > Best, > > Michael W. Carroll > Associate Professor of Law > Villanova University School of Law
- Prev by Date: Re: NIH as publisher
- Next by Date: Re: NIH as publisher
- Previous by thread: Re: NIH as publisher
- Next by thread: Re: NIH as publisher
- Index(es):