[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NIH as publisher
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: NIH as publisher
- From: Samuel Trosow <strosow@uwo.ca>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:46:57 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Where it ends is that NIH is finally taking on some responsibility for the public dissemination of publicly funded research. This is something the government should always be doing. The critics of NIH here are simply rehashing the same old argument that government funded agencies should never ever compete with the private sector. But I think this ideological line has finally spent itself and it's time to move on. We see where this position has gotten us so it's quite refreshing to see a public agency take on projects of this sort. What's the difference between this issue and what Reed Elsivier and the publishing industry did to PubScience? I don't see any. Sam Trosow Uuniversity of Western Ontario
- Prev by Date: Re: NIH as publisher
- Next by Date: Re: NIH as publisher
- Previous by thread: Re: NIH as publisher
- Next by thread: Re: NIH as publisher
- Index(es):