[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Berkeley faculty statement on scholarly publishing
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Berkeley faculty statement on scholarly publishing
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 19:47:21 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The Berkeley statement talks about OA in general, not merely OA Journals. The work Anthony mentions discussed OA journals only, showing that for the particular large research libraries studied the cost for OA Journals, with the university paying publication fees "on behalf of the author", was higher than the current cost with the university paying subscription fees "on behalf of the reader" Explicit warning was given against assuming the conclusions held for other similar universities. For the university I know best, the conclusion would not hold. As Berkeley also does not have a medical school (which typically has a large output of papers per author) the conclusion might not hold there either. But for authors anywhere there are many forms of OA publishing less expensive than OA Journals. If Berkeley faculty were to publish primarily in repositories such as arXiv, as in some fields many of them probably already do, then the costs would be much lower. If they were to subscribe only to the publications they truly needed, and relied on Green OA access to those that perhaps might be needed, the cost to them would also be much lower. The full statement of principles is open, at http://academic-senate.berkeley.edu/news/statement_of_prin_for_web.pdf The full webcast of the conference is apparently not yet available, but considering the main speakers http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/scholarlypublishing/speakers.html and the topics of the breakout sessions, at http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/scholarlypublishing/breakouts.html a wide range of possibilities appears to have been discussed. If Berkeley is as it was when I was a graduate student there, the faculty are quite capable of educating themselves, and also of making use of the good analyses done by librarians, such as the authors of the very work Anthony refers to. Dr. David Goodman Associate Professor Palmer School of Library and Information Science Long Island University dgoodman@liu.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of Anthony Watkinson Sent: Thu 5/5/2005 8:25 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Berkeley faculty statement on scholarly publishing When I tried to access the URL given here I was told it was forbidden. Could we have some open access to this statement? I am also puzzled by the statement by Professor Agogino about lower costs to the university. Has Berkeley done a study that has come to a different result from the Cornell and other studies (showing higher costs to the university under an OA regime) or has Professor Agogino been badly "educated" by her library? Anthony Watkinson
- Prev by Date: Re: US University OA Resolutions Omit Most Important Component
- Next by Date: Re: Berkeley faculty statement on scholarly publishing
- Previous by thread: Re: Berkeley faculty statement on scholarly publishing
- Next by thread: Re: Berkeley faculty statement on scholarly publishing
- Index(es):