[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open Access and For-Pay Access (to the same IR materials)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <mefunk@mail.med.cornell.edu>
- Subject: Re: Open Access and For-Pay Access (to the same IR materials)
- From: "Peter Banks" <pbanks@diabetes.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 21:47:11 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I do not consider a group of journals that, on average, rank at the 39th percentile, "similar" to journals in general (the 50th percentile). In most areas of research or human activity, an 11 point different is quite significant indeed. (I would be very pleased if my times in 5K races rose from the 39th percentile, where they are on a good day, to the 50th percentile). That's not to say that there aren't excellent OA journals (though it is interesting to note that there is not one OA journal above in the 90th percentile of Life Sciences, Physics, of Chemistry--fields where OA has a longer track record than in medicine--and only one each in those categories above the 80th percentile). These are interesting preliminary data--with the operative word being "preliminary." OA journals are too new to make any grand conclusions one way or the other about their quality, citation indices, or long-term influence on scientific research. Peter Banks Publisher American Diabetes Association 1701 North Beauregard Street Alexandria, VA 22311 703/299-2033 FAX 703/683-2890 Email: pbanks@diabetes.org >>> mefunk@mail.med.cornell.edu 4/30/2005 7:00:13 AM >>> Open Access means sloppy publications? "The impact factors of nearly 200 open-access journals are similar to those of traditional journals in the same fields, according to a recent Thomson ISI report. The 58 open-access medical journals that receive impact factors fell, on average, at the 40th percentile of all medical journals, with all but 11 ranking higher than the 10th percentile. For life sciences journals, the 37 open-access journals were ranked, on average, at the 39th percentile." http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20040427/05/ http://www.isinet.com/media/presentrep/acropdf/impact-oa-journals.pdf Open Access is treasonous? Does the Attorney General know this? Mark Funk Head, Collection Development Weill Cornell Medical Library 1300 York Avenue New York, NY 10021 mefunk@mail.med.cornell.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: More on Google digitization and Europe
- Next by Date: [no subject]
- Previous by thread: Re: Open Access and For-Pay Access (to the same IR materials)
- Next by thread: Re: Open Access and For-Pay Access (to the same IR materials)
- Index(es):