[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Comparing Institutional Membership to Per-Article Payment
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Comparing Institutional Membership to Per-Article Payment
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 19:47:34 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
If it had not been obvious before, these exchanges demonstrate that there is no payment scheme that is fair to all libraries. Discussing it in the context of particular journals and particular libraries is particularly futile: the accidents of particular programs will make some journals more costly to Cornell than to Yale, and some the other way round. This entire ingenious thread has been directed to solving a problem that cannot be solved. If authors publish as much�as they do in as expensive a fashion as they do, clearly the cost to the system (excluding handling charges) will be the same. There cannot be any way of saving significant net money except to publish in a radically less expensive fashion. Dr. David Goodman Associate Professor Palmer School of Library and Information Science Long Island University dgoodman@liu.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Revision to Physical Review B data
- Next by Date: =?GB2312?B?xfq3or6rxrfNvMrp?=
- Previous by thread: Re: Comparing Institutional Membership to Per-Article Payment
- Next by thread: Swets and CSIRO PUBLISHING Join Forces in China
- Index(es):