[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: creative commons licencing
- To: <aotg20@dsl.pipex.com>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: creative commons licencing
- From: "Michael Carroll" <Carroll@law.villanova.edu>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:03:23 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Richar Poynder wrote: <<This would seem to imply that authors could self-archive their papers under Creative Commons by means of the SPARC Addendum, while still using the publisher's copyright form. But perhaps Michael Carroll could clarify? >> Richard's got it right. To be clear, "using the publisher's copyright form" with either Addendum means that the terms of the copyright transfer/license are those in the publisher's form unless those terms conflict with the terms in the Addendum, in which case the Addendum governs. Either Addendum provides that the author retains sufficient rights to grant a Creative Commons non-commercial/attribution license. If the publisher's form does not grant the author at least those rights, the Addendum serves to substitute its terms for the publisher's with respect to the copyright grant. Best, MC Peter Banks said: > I am not familiar enough with the varieties of the CC licenses to say > which would be accepted and which not. > > However, the question is somewhat beside the point for us, because > authors are required to sign our own copyright assignment forms; we do > not accept other copyright forms. Michael W. Carroll Associate Professor of Law Villanova University School of Law
- Prev by Date: E-reserves in California (CHE)
- Next by Date: Copyright Symposium
- Previous by thread: RE: creative commons licencing
- Next by thread: Re: DOAJ update
- Index(es):