[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ask a Live Librarian Online
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Ask a Live Librarian Online
- From: "Mary Seligman" <seligman@adelphi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:44:02 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I'm curious about the notion of mailing an article to an 'unaffiliated' user. Would this be considered interlibrary loan? If so, doesn't the item have to then go through the user's library? If mailing out copies of articles to anyone who asks is not a violation of the license agreement, then why would it be necessary for all colleges to pay for journal databases? In theory, a small college could tell its students to get what they need from other colleges. Just a thought .... Mary Seligman >>> twilliam@bbl.usouthal.edu 03/28/05 19:06 PM >>> We've been offering "live chat" for a couple of years now. The vast majority of our chat users are affiliated students and faculty, most especially distance education students. When they request a specific article that we subscribe to electronically, we usually link them automatically to the article and let them print/download or whatever. However, there is nothing to stop us, based on my interpretation of our license, to simply send them the article directly to their email. Again, these are our own students, faculty, etc. who are "authorized users" as defined by our licenses. It is different when someone logs in to chat and is not affiliated with our institution and thus not an authorized user. We offer them the same Reference and other services available on chat but they are unable to link directly to the article nor can we send them the article by email. We can, however, print the article and send/fax it to them or scan it for Ariel transmission. However, someone made the point that these "unaffiliated" users coming in to the Online Chat line should be considered "walk in users." I'm not sure if our publishers/vendors would buy into this but it's a nice thought. Given that we are all becoming very much libraries without walls, can a case be made for this? Perhaps this is a topic for further discussion. Tom Williams Mary Seligman wrote: >Good morning: > >I'm assuming that to remotely access the electronic resources, a patron >would need to have a user name and password issued by the university. As >long as that criterion is met, there would be no violation of the license >agreement. A walk-in patron would not have remote access authorization. >If I understand this situation, the 'walk-in' user would be viewing >documents via a librarian. I think it's likely a violation of the intent >of the license to limit off campus use to authorized users. > >Mary Seligman >Acquisitions Librarian >Adelphi University >Garden City, NY 11530
- Prev by Date: CHE on bookless library at Merced
- Next by Date: RE: Ask a Live Librarian Online
- Previous by thread: Re: Ask a Live Librarian Online
- Next by thread: RE: Ask a Live Librarian Online
- Index(es):