[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Asking for your input re. scholarly publishing developments
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Asking for your input re. scholarly publishing developments
- From: Liblicense-L Listowner <liblicen@pantheon.yale.edu>
- Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:06:54 -0500 (EST)
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Dear Liblicense-l readers: For a talk I'm giving later this spring, I've been asking colleagues a pair of questions, which I'd also like to pose to readers of this list. I'd be glad to summarize the answers and would appreciate hearing from you this week if possible. Question #1: Over the last ten years, what strategies or developments have particularly and visibly influenced the way scholarly publishing and library collections development are done? [For example, some unsurprising answers so far have been: Ejournal aggregations (such as JSTOR, HighWire, Muse); The Big Deal; Google; Open Access; Consortia] Question #2: What has been the high or transforming impact of the developments you chose (i.e., why did you name them?) Please do answer and please don't feel limited by the list above. Thank you, Ann Okerson Yale Library
- Prev by Date: Re: Ann Okerson on institutional archives
- Next by Date: Waist Magnetic Trimmer
- Previous by thread: Re: Ann Okerson on institutional archives
- Next by thread: Re: Asking for your input re. scholarly publishing developments
- Index(es):