[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open Access
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Open Access
- From: "William Walsh" <libwdw@langate.gsu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:48:32 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Peter Banks writes: Personally, I think that something like the Creative Commons License would be disaster for authors, publishers, and librarians, since it affords no protection against the misstatement, exploitation, and diffusion of a work. Response: Which Creative Commons License? Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works? Have there been problems with authors publishing with PLoS, which uses just the CC attribution license? Is this in reaction to CC's Science Commons project<http://science.creativecommons.org/>? Sorry if this sounds snarky; I'm just curious. Thanks, Bill William Walsh Head, Acquisitions Department Georgia State University Library 100 Decatur Street, SE Atlanta, GA 30303 Phone: 404.651.2149 Fax: 404.651.2148 Email: wwalsh@gsu.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Open Access
- Next by Date: Re: Open Access
- Previous by thread: RE: Open Access
- Next by thread: Re: Open Access
- Index(es):