[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Open Access in Europe
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Open Access in Europe
- From: "Dempsey,Lorcan" <dempseyl@oclc.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:40:13 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
There is an important further point to be made here, which relates to Point 3 made by Kurt below. In some casese, European countries have mechanisms through which catalytic central funding may be channeled once a policy direction is agreed. OA activity is now supported by several national programs, which in turn promote additional insitutional effort. This may provide part funding and other support for some or all of: institutional project development, shared service frameworks/infrastructure, software development, and awareness raising. Some examples: Kurt mentions the Dare initiative: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue41/vanderkuil/ In the UK see the various projects funded as part of the FAIR program by JISC: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/index.cfm?name=programme_fair See also, for comparison, the ARROW project in Australia: http://arrow.edu.au/ Lorcan Lorcan Dempsey [http://orweblog.oclc.org] OCLC Research [http://www.oclc.org/research/] -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Belder, K.F.K. Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 7:27 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Open Access in Europe <SNIP> How does this then relate to OA? It is certainly true that for a number of Western European countries OA and OAI are strong topics, but not that different from the initiatives and discussions in the US. At the last CNI (Coalition for Networked Information) meetings (in Washington DC and Portland OR) Open Access and Open Archives were major topics and a number of prominent universities reported on a variety of initiatives that parallel European initiatives. I do agree that some libraries in Europe - such as e.g. Dutch libraries - are taking a lead role vis-a-vis most US university libraries. How can this be explained? 1. I think a number of Dutch (UK, Scandinavian and German) libraries have woken up in the last 5-7 years and started thinking more innovatively about their services and mission that they had done before. This could mean that European libraries that awakened to a digital reality more recently have perhaps taken initiatives that are ahead of those (US) libraries that were already quite awake for many years but might have lost some of their edge in this area. 2. I also believe that differences in the organization of scholarly communication (compare e.g. Dutch/US) might be more fruitful to look into for an explanation why OA/OAI is getting a stronger focus in e.g. the Netherlands than the US. In the Netherlands most of the scientific journals are now in the hands of a number of large commercial publishers (Elsevier, Kluwer, Springer, etc.). Premiere journals that used to be published by Dutch scholarly societies and universities have been taken over by these commercial publishers or have disappeared. In the US we can notice, at this point, a much more diversified publication market for researchers in the STM field. I'm thinking about a number of scholarly societies that publish some of the most important titles in their field but also about initiatives such as the Highwire Press that have allowed these societies to compete with the digital wave of commercial publishers. The greater OA/OAI emphasis might very well be partially explained by this difference in the organization of scholarly communication. 3. One other important reason for the perceived difference in emphasis on OA/OAI is that libraries and universities in e.g. the Netherlands collaborate much more closely than the more competitive model that exists in higher education in the US. Whatever can be said on the pro and con side of both models, one result of the closer collaboration is that when Dutch universities and libraries finally make a decision to take up a particular initiative it becomes more easily a nationwide effort - e.g. the DARE initiative in the Netherlands - and the impact becomes automatically much greater than the piecemeal approach that is more typical for the US. I'm sorry for this longish expose, but I hope my remarks can have some value in this discussion. Kind regards, Kurt Kurt De Belder University Librarian & Director University Library Leiden University E: k.f.k.de.belder@library.leidenuniv.nl W: http://website.leidenuniv.nl/~belderkfkde/english.htm
- Prev by Date: Research in a Privatized World
- Next by Date: Re: BMC titles indexing in NLM PubMed
- Previous by thread: RE: Open Access in Europe
- Next by thread: Marcel Dekker e-journals move to Taylor & Francis Journals Online
- Index(es):