[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to Sean of Elsevier
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Reply to Sean of Elsevier
- From: Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:26:39 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> I feel that it's worth pointing out that earnings per share (EPS) are > pretty well independent of pricing policy. JE: This is an amazing statement. It is simply not true. Yes, multiple factors are involved in EPS, but pricing is absolutely a key component in building the income statement. Try lowering all your prices 30 percent and still increasing EPS! An accurate statement would be (and I think this is increasingly true of Elsevier): "A well-managed company has many vehicles with which to increase EPS, of which increased pricing is but one." An even better one would be: "Of the many ways of building EPS, price increases are among the worst, as they tend to indicate a business that has matured and for which the management has lost confidence in its ability to add value through innovation." -- Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: From Haafkens Caroline
- Next by Date: Typo (Tony McSean)
- Previous by thread: From Haafkens Caroline
- Next by thread: Typo (Tony McSean)
- Index(es):