[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Librarians, Publishing Behavior, & Open Access
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Librarians, Publishing Behavior, & Open Access
- From: Jill Emery <Jill.Emery@mail.uh.edu>
- Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 19:25:57 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Chuck & Others, First, why is it, that as a profession, we are so unwilling to make allowances for the tremendous costs that a publisher had to undertake to shift their whole operational base from print journal production to online journal production? In the 1990's every major publisher was in the process of figuring out what their niche would be in the scholarly publishing market place, ceasing some titles, merging others, developing new, more internationally based content, and attempting to develop an online presence for their content. All of these endeavors required the expenditure of significant amounts of money. Have we learned nothing from our initial attempts at the development of institutional repositories at our individual campuses? What is amazing to me is that our profession can attack the for-profit publishing world for cost-gouging while at the same time be admitting to ourselves that undertaking the management and maintenance of scholarly publication online is a very expensive and skill-intensive activity. Second, in relation to open access publication, the one area where we, as a profession, have been most vocal, we have also been most hypocritical. How many library and information science journals are truly open access? How many of these are actually published/provided in the United States? It took pressure last year for ALA/ACRL to even make open access articles in C&RL & C&RL News freely available to the profession. None of the publications from ALA are fully open access despite their lip service to be proponents of open access endeavors. You are quite right to question if we, as a profession, will act any differently than any other faculty in regards to truly examining and changing our publication habits. However, I also see nothing to be gained from maintaining the "us" against "them" scenario in relation to librarians and for-profit publishers. There is more ground to be gained from working with the for-profit publishing community than in continually calling them out for trying to maintain viability in an increasingly complex marketplace. -Jill Emery ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Jill Emery Director, Electronic Resources Program University of Houston 114 University Libraries Houston, TX 77204-2000 713.743.9765 713.743.9778 (fax) JEmery@uh.edu ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- Prev by Date: RE: OhioLINK cuts back Big Deals
- Next by Date: RE: Emerald responds to dual publication
- Previous by thread: New NIH publication policy
- Next by thread: Re: Librarians, Publishing Behavior, & Open Access
- Index(es):