[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Emerald responds to dual publication
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Emerald responds to dual publication
- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:58:03 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The uncovering of systematic article duplication by Emerald/MCB Press by Philip Davis raises anew concerns about librarian's role in managing scholarly information. Journal inflation via unwarranted publication in journals intended for original research is not new. Deana Astle and I explored the history of this in "Journal publishing: Pricing and structural issues in the 1930s and the 1980s" (ADVANCES IN SERIALS MANAGEMENT, vol. 2, 1988: 1-36). The most flagrant example from the 1920's and 30's was German scientific publications including dissertations in chemistry and physics journals, upping the page count to "justify" exorbitant prices. Beginning in the 1950's and exemplified by Robert Maxwell's infamous practices, some publishers regularly fill up space in journals with conference proceedings. Identified in the 1980's was the LPU, or "Least Publishable Unit", also known as "salami publication designed to expand a resume and inflate article counts. In this context, of repeated complaints in library literature and in the broader scholarly literature, it is surprising to see Dr. Howard of Emerald/MCB write: "If there had been but one complaint...". in his press release. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/rpsv/news/press/dual2005.htm The profession has been complaining about inflated content from publishers for most of his career as a publisher. Our words have obviously fallen on deaf ears. The real question is not about Emerald. It's about librarians. For the last twenty years we have taken the message to faculty that they should care greatly about the publishing behavior and pricing policies of publishers of "their" journals. We have preached that they should be examining their practices. It turns out our own literature exemplifies some of what we have been complaining of in other literatures. Will we behave differently than faculty in other areas? Chuck Hamaker Associate University Librarian Collections and Technical Services Atkins Library University of North Carolina Charlotte Charlotte, NC 28223 phone 704 687-2825
- Prev by Date: Returned due to virus; was: Delivery service mail
- Next by Date: RE : More on Google
- Previous by thread: Emerald responds to dual publication
- Next by thread: RE: Emerald responds to dual publication
- Index(es):