[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SPAM-LOW: RE: Question regarding ILL
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: RE: Question regarding ILL
- From: "Michael Carroll" <Carroll@law.villanova.edu>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:54:41 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Creative Commons licenses will work for options 1 and 2a. See www.creativecommons.org Best, Michael W. Carroll Associate Professor of Law Villanova University School of Law Research papers at http://ssrn.com/author=330326 See also www.creativecommons.org >>> chief-exec@alpsp.org 1/30/2005 2:23:38 PM >>> I have for some time thought that it would make a huge difference to the easy, 'seamless' acquisition of documents, if everyone in the information chain could be persuaded to adopt a standard interface 'module', if you like. Essentially, for any given document, there is a limited number of options: 1) It is freely accessible to all 2) It is not freely accessible to all but: a) You have access rights to it b) You can purchase it at price 'x' c) You cannot access it at any price (!) I really wish someone would develop such a module. Any takers out there? Sally Morris, Chief Executive Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers E-mail: chief-exec@alpsp.org
- Prev by Date: Emerald responds to dual publication
- Next by Date: February issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Previous by thread: Emerald responds to dual publication
- Next by thread: February issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Index(es):